thomas.wieberneit@aheadcrm.co.nz
AI Agents: Finally, a Digital Assistant That Doesn’t Just Sound Smart?

AI Agents: Finally, a Digital Assistant That Doesn’t Just Sound Smart?

So, the time of agentic AI has come? What does this mean? Not for businesses, but for business users. These days, the main tool in the quiver of every business user in an enterprise is … the web browser. Initially web interfaces to business software and then SaaS software has seen to this. The result? Employees needed to build their workflows around a plethora of different web applications, having open a corresponding number of tabs at any given time. I just counted the ones that I have open: fifty-three. And that doesn’t even count the web browsers that I do not even recognize as such. For example, Apple Calendar, or Microsoft Outlook. Maybe even MS Word … one never knows where there’s a browser these days … Now, with agentic AI moving into the business, these workflows will need to change. How, that heavily depends on the vendors one works with and, of course, the size of the own business. One of the main considerations when moving towards agentic workflows or agent-supported workflows is the orchestration of agents. This becomes especially important when working with different software packages and this is also a core reason for the emergence of protocols like MCP (model context protocol) and A2A (agent to agent) or ACP (Agent Communication Protocol) that are currently developed. Plus, there are a few “agentic” browsers emerging that allow for the orchestration of different agents on the user level. But what is best, what to use – and when? After all, many of the vendors that are already in house, have their own strategies. And many of the buyers,...
Beyond the Call Center: Unifying CX, One Definition at a Time (Finally!)

Beyond the Call Center: Unifying CX, One Definition at a Time (Finally!)

Beginning of September 2025, the CRM Magazine published its 2025 CRM Industry Leader Awards on Destination CRM. This year, the awards nominate five outstanding companies across eleven categories. As in recent years, CRM Magazine asked some renowned analysts to chose Industry Leaders for 2025 using a simple question: “If you had to recommend a CRM solution—whether an enterprise suite, contact center infrastructure, or a customer data platform—to a client, what would they choose, and why?” And, of course, the analysts – being analysts – gave their answers. And good answers they are. But this is not the topic of this post.  What is it then? Glad you asked … It is about the term “unified customer experience platform” and the corresponding award category. Looking at the winners and their corresponding descriptions, it turns out that there seems to be a clear dominance of customer service and contact center solutions in this area – with the exception of the honorary mention of Sprinklr, which has its origins in the social media sphere. This dominance suggests that customer experience is somehow made equivalent to customer service. This shows quite some success of the narratives that CCaaS and customer service vendors are telling. This is especially true if very renowned analysts, who are in part thought leaders as well, follow it. Which somewhat irks me. And it reminds me of how the term CRM got more and more appropriated by vendors of sales force automation, SFA, solutions, until CRM almost became synonymous to SFA, which it isn’t. And never was. Again, this is not about the winners. They are great and very...
The great CCaaS Meltdown: What It Means for Customers and CX

The great CCaaS Meltdown: What It Means for Customers and CX

The past weeks showed quite some interesting activity on the mergers and acquisitions and the partnership frontiers. NiCE acquired the German conversational AI rock star Cognigy for $955M and a short time later announced that the company enhanced its partnership with Salesforce. At nearly the same time, Genesys received an additional funding of $1.5 bn from Salesforce and ServiceNow. Salesforce acquired Waii and Bluebird. VC company Thoma Bravo acquired the still leading CCaaS vendor Verint, to name but a few of the more interesting, and perhaps consequential ones. On top of all this, Avaya seems to have offered all employees a voluntary exit package. What all this shows is that there is significant consolidation going on in the AI-assisted (or should I say, driven?) CCaaS market and that various players are battling to provide – or at least be perceived to provide – the most comprehensive and valuable platform while others fight for survival. Yes, it’s nothing new, but can’t be repeated often enough. The CX market is and always was a high stakes platform game. The stakes got even higher with the advent, the promise and the necessary investments that generative AI and agentic AI require. While one can consider Salesforce’s acquisitions as tuck-ins that help rounding off its Agentforce platform, the other ones are a sign of something bigger going on in the CCaaS and customer service market segments. It is also notable that exactly these sectors get more and more referred to as CX market, whether this is a correct, or only good, attribution, or not. Hint: It isn’t. Not unexpectedly, Salesforce is in the thick...
Beyond the Hype: Unlocking GenAI ROI in the Enterprise

Beyond the Hype: Unlocking GenAI ROI in the Enterprise

My past two column articles on CustomerThink dealt with how to determine the return of agentic investments and whether agentic AI delivers at all. The question of ability to deliver is particularly interesting for me, as I am researching measurable results other than cost savings in contained business areas for some months now, and regularly find a very strong focus on customer service and marketing, with customer service functions being best able to report measurable results. This is evidenced by the number of success stories I find, supported by the publication of a recent TEI of Zendesk customer service study.  However, most of this is anecdotal evidence, or vendor sponsored/commissioned. And which vendor likes to speak about failures? Similar for buyers who understandably do not like to be in the spotlight with investments that turned out to be less than successful. There hasn’t been too much in depth research on whether generative and/or agentic AI deliver to promise or not.  Luckily, there has been at least some research evaluating the capabilities of LLM based AI agents in business environments published this year. CRMArena-Pro by Salesforce Research naturally has a focus on CRM tasks across B2B and B2C scenarios. The authors identified nineteen tasks commonly executed in CRM systems and categorize these tasks in the four business skill categories database querying and numerical computation, information retrieval and reasoning, workflow execution, and policy compliance and includes a confidentiality awareness evaluation. TheAgentCompany on one hand covers a wider area along the business value chain but on the other hand has a narrower focus on software engineering companies. One other main difference between...
Beyond the Box: How Moving Companies Fail at Customer Experience

Beyond the Box: How Moving Companies Fail at Customer Experience

The other day, I got robbed. Not literally, but figuratively. Now, you might wonder what this has to do with the main theme of this blog, which is about CRM and customer experience. It has, believe me. Some of you might know that I just relocated from the Seattle area to the Charleston area, so pretty much once across the country. Moving house is a big endeavor, but not necessarily a complicated one. In its simplest terms it involves packing stuff, potentially storing stuff, transporting stuff, and unpacking stuff. As a family of five tends to have a lot of stuff, it is a good idea to hire the services of a moving company to take care of all the logistics. Moving companies take care of most of the work, normally minus the considerable effort of unpacking a few hundred boxes. But usually, their base services cover the disassembly, packing, and normally also the reassembly of furniture, minus some possible exclusions that normally are explicitly mentioned. There are roughly two types of moving companies, brokers that act as a main contractor and subcontract the job to third parties, and those who have own operations, either directly or via a network of companies. Regularly used terms of payment are half at packaging and half on delivery, sometimes combined with a more or less substantial downpayment at the time of signing the contract. As it is with all businesses, it also pays off to do some research. Which we did, settling on one of the companies with the best reputation. After all, we have done several intercontinental moves before, the last...